Categories
Uncategorized

Legal: precurement and contract law

Points: 300 Assignment 3: The FAR and Contract Provisions for Protection Criteria   Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations […]

Points: 300

Assignment 3: The FAR and Contract Provisions for Protection

Criteria

 
Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

 
Fair
70-79% C

 
Proficient
80-89% B

 
Exemplary
90-100% A

1. Evaluate the importance of the standard default clause. As a contracts officer for the DOE, suggest two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Provide a rationale for your response.
Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the importance of the standard default clause. Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.  

Insufficiently evaluated the importance of the standard default clause. Insufficiently suggested two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.  

Partially evaluated the importance of the standard default clause. Partially suggested two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Partially provided a rationale for your response.  

Satisfactorily evaluated the importance of the standard default clause. Satisfactorily suggested two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.  

Thoroughly evaluated the importance of the standard default clause. Thoroughly suggested two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.  

2. Speculate on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Next, suggest the most secure method for making a contractual change. Justify your response.
Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Did not submit or incompletely suggested the most secure method for making a contractual change. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Insufficiently speculated on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Insufficiently suggested the most secure method for making a contractual change. Insufficiently justified your response.

Partially speculated on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Partially suggested the most secure method for making a contractual change. Partially justified your response.

Satisfactorily speculated on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Satisfactorily suggested the most secure method for making a contractual change. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Thoroughly speculated on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Thoroughly suggested the most secure method for making a contractual change. Thoroughly justified your response.

3. As a contracts officer for the DOE, suggest two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Provide a rationale for your response.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Insufficiently suggested two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

Partially suggested two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily suggested two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly suggested two (2) improvements that you would make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

4. 3 references
Weight: 5%

No reference provided; or, does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.

Meets the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present
 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE SOLUTION!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *